Librarian 2.0 Manifesto

A video mash-up of the Librarian 2.0 Manifesto by Laura Cohen:



Some of the commentators at YouTube have wondered, condescendingly, what images from the counter-cultural festival Burning Man have to do with libraries. Well, they have a point, although Burning Man is a regular indulgence of Sergey Brin and Larry Page, the two Stanford academics behind Google. And you could make the argument that Google represents the leading edge of Web 2.0 (first dot-com and tech company to succeed in the wake of the dot-com crash), or that Google is the most widely-used information retrieval tool of choice in modern libraries.

However, I think the commentators have a point when they note that in all her points, Cohen does not once mention "reading".

Future of movies in libraries

Libraryman brings up a recent BBC article on Netflix:

US DVD rental firm Netflix is to release a set-top box which will let subscribers download movies and other programmes over the net.

Libraryman considers the implications for public libraries:

True, “Netflix has spent about $40m on the development of its streaming service during the past year.” and that of course surely does not include licensing and revenue related math for the studios, etc. True also that money talks, eh? Still, given the mission of the library (particularly Public Libraries) it seems worth noting that:

As an industry, within the larger library-centric institutions that could make important impacts:
-We are not researching this kind of content delivery in any truly significant way.
-We are not planning to, in the future, provide specific deliverables based around his kind of content delivery.
-We do not have organized, direct or significant relationships with the companies that own the largest collections of popular content and manage it’s distribution to approach them as a potential distribution channel.
-We do not have the legal and negotiation teams that would be required to get our patrons access to the content controlled by companies mentioned above.

Some of people in his comments have suggested OverDrive and similar services as the future of providing content for public libraries. I'm not entirely sure these services have a broad enough selection yet. But maybe we've set ourselves up to fail by placing such pre-eminence on circulation and database usage statistics as performance indicators. Right now at my workplace, there are dozens of students studying for their exams who are not checking out books or using our computers for anything. Are we not providing them a valueable, if perhaps unquantifiable, service?

Reading on a Dream

This library musical was supposedly a prank played on the other patrons, but I have a feeling it was at least partly staged (How do you place all those cameras otherwise?).

Still, cute gag.

Hand-eye coordination

This is a really neat concept--a visual display keyboard, on the same principles of the iPhone or iPod Touch:



Typing Mode



Video Mode

Only conceptual for now, but it's a step closer to making the "flexies" (flexible computer screens/keyboards/cellphones/PDAs) from Alastair Reynolds's Pushing Ice a reality.